February 1, 2010

There is something about being crushed by Roger Federer that brings out the hidden comedian lurking in otherwise humourless players. Andy Roddick is the undisputed champion of gallows humour but Andy Murray took a shot at claiming his crown after being defeated in straight sets in the final of the Australian Open. Struggling to hold back the tears, Murray said, “I can cry as well as Roger. It’s just a shame I can’t play as well as him.” It was the one moment that belonged to Murray. During the match itself Federer imposed his will on his opponent time and time again.

The Australian Open was Federer’s 16th slam, two more than any other player. And there are no signs that he is going to stop here. He already had the best forehand in the game but apparently that wasn’t good enough since he has flattened it out and improved his speed. It may sound absurd, but this may be the year Federer completes the Grand Slam — all four majors in a calendar year.

Murray, meanwhile, needs to make one major change in his game. He is the best counter-puncher around and if his opponent has even a slightly off day he will always win. But over the course of seven five-set matches, at least one player will be in form. To win those matches, he has to develop an attacking game and not try to simply put the ball back into play. His defensive strategy will always end in tears.

Nadir Hassan is a Pakistan-based journalist and assistant editor at Newsline.